Organoid screening workflow
Application Note

Capturing the Whole Organoid in a Single Shot

Volumetric drug-response screening of 3D tumor organoids in 384-well format with ZEISS Lightfield 4D

By Peter Favreau, ZEISS Microscopy

9 Min Read  |  June 2026

 

Three-dimensional (3D) in vitro models such as organoids capture tumor architecture, cell–cell interactions, and drug penetration far better than flat 2D monolayers, but turning that biology into quantitative data at screening scale has remained a bottleneck. Conventional confocal imaging reconstructs each organoid from a serial stack of optical sections, and across a multiwell plate that adds up quickly. This application note shows how the ZEISS LSM 990 with Lightfield 4D captures the entire volume of an organoid in a single snapshot, without the need for imaging sequential optical sections, making quantitative drug-response screening practical in a 384-well plate. Colorectal tumor organoids treated with the topoisomerase inhibitor SN-38 showed a clear dose-dependent loss of tumor cells (roughly 57% at the highest dose), and analyzing the full 3D volume recovered about 2 – 2.5 times more cells than a 2D projection of the very same data.

  • 1 snap icon lettering

    Full organoid volume, no z-stepping

  • ~57% icon lettering

    Tumor-cell loss at 500 nM SN-38

  • 2-2.5x icon lettering

    More cells counted in 3D vs. 2D

The 3D screening bottleneck

Organoids and other 3D models are now central to drug discovery and toxicology because they recapitulate in vivo tissue organization in ways that monolayer cultures cannot. Running these models at scale, however, places three competing demands on the imaging step: enough speed to image many organoids for statistical power, enough reproducibility in both organoid formation and measured response to trust the numbers, and response metrics that capture the full 3D biology rather than a flattened proxy of it.


Imaging is where those demands collide. Acquiring the complete 3D morphology of every organoid by serial optical sectioning can be prohibitively slow across a full plate. Collapsing each organoid to a single 2D plane is fast but discards the morphology that motivated the 3D model in the first place. A common compromise is sampling a thin slab through the organoid, yet this can be misleading when organoids are irregular or heterogeneous, as is often the case with patient-derived samples. The screening question thus becomes how to keep the full volume without paying the full acquisition cost.

One snap. One volume.

Spinning-disk confocal microscopy is the workhorse for volumetric organoid imaging, but it still acquires a volume the slow way: plane by plane, typically twenty to forty sections to span a single 150–250 µm organoid. The ZEISS LSM 990 with Lightfield 4D takes a different route. It records multiple angular views of the sample at once and computationally reconstructs a complete volume from that single acquisition. In other words, one snapshot, one volume, with no z-stepping (Figure 1).

The Lightfield 4D principle interactive graphic

Figure 1: The Lightfield 4D principle. Multiple lens views are captured simultaneously, each encoding distinct spatial and angular information; deconvolution-based processing reconstructs a volume that can be handled and analyzed like a conventional z-stack.

Final output: Reconstructed z-stack for subsequent analysis with ZEN and arivis​
Figure D: Reconstructed z-stack for subsequent analysis with ZEN and arivis​
3D result (ortho views)
Figure C: 3D result (ortho views)
Views from different angles
Figure B: Readout of different angles graphic
Readout of all 37 views
Figure A graphic: readout of all 37 views

Removing the z-stack changes the throughput equation, because per-well acquisition time is then governed by exposure alone rather than multiplied by the number of slices. For context, a spinning-disk acquisition of a comparable organoid might take several seconds per well, whereas a single Lightfield 4D snapshot captures the same volume in a fraction of that time.


Just as useful for screening is that Lightfield 4D and Airyscan live on the same LSM 990 platform. That makes a two-tier, screen-then-interrogate workflow possible: image the whole plate rapidly with Lightfield 4D, then revisit the wells that stand out at higher resolution with Airyscan. No instrument change necessary, no sample transfer, and no sample re-registration.

From plate to 3D readout

In this study, the organoids were grown by pairing green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled HCT-116 human colorectal carcinoma cells with red fluorescent protein (RFP)-labeled human dermal fibroblasts (hDFs) as a tumor–stroma co-culture. These cell types were grown at two seeding densities in InSphero Akura™ 384 ImagePro multiwell plates. Organoids were cleared and counterstained with the nuclear dye DAPI. On day four, they were treated with the highly potent anti-neoplastic drug SN-38. SN-38 was administered across four concentrations from 0.5 nM to 500 nM, alongside dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) vehicle controls and untreated media controls (Figure 2).

  • Layout of the 384-well organoid plate

    Figure 2. Layout of the 384-well organoid plate. Two tumor-to-stroma seeding densities were arranged across the plate, each with an SN-38 dose series from 0.5 nM to 500 nM plus DMSO vehicle and media controls.functionality. Finally, images are passed to arivis Pro for collating multiwell data and analysis.

    Download image (739 KB)

The acquisition itself followed a simple survey-then-image logic (Figure 3): a low-magnification overview scan first confirms which wells contain organoids and where they sit; flagged wells are then imaged volumetrically with Lightfield 4D in three fluorescence channels; and any wells of particular interest are re-imaged with Airyscan on the same instrument for higher-resolution detail.

Figure 3: Organoid screening workflow with ZEISS Lightfield 4D. A low-magnification survey locates organoids; selected wells are imaged with Lightfield 4D; noteworthy wells are interrogated with Airyscan on the same LSM 990; and data are collated and analyzed in ZEISS arivis Pro.

Load plate 384 well organoid plate
analyze data Multiwell analysis in arivis Pro
Multiwell analysis with ZEISS arivis Pro software
4D capture 3D imaging with Lightfield 4D
Live imaging with ZEISS airyscan
High resolution imaging Detailed Airyscan capture of a single organoid on demand
High resolution imaging with Airyscan
pick wells Identify wells to image
identify wells to image

Quantification was performed in ZEISS arivis Pro. A U-Net deep-learning model first segmented each organoid from its well, after which cells were detected per channel and scored only if they fell inside the segmented 3D organoid. The 3D analysis yielded per-well cell counts, compartment volumes, and fluorescence intensities. Of the 384 wells, 322 were successfully analyzed; the roughly 20% loss occurred during clearing, washing, and handling rather than imaging.

Video walkthrough of the organoid screening workflow

  • Video walkthrough of the organoid screening workflow. ZEISS LSM Lightfield 4D provides both speed and detailed 3D information without compromise. The system allows for quick identification of organoid locations and rapid acquisition of whole volumes, ensuring optimal imaging conditions.

Response to treatment

A representative control well imaged with Lightfield 4D, then segmented in arivis Pro, is shown in Figure 4; the identical field of view re-imaged with Airyscan (Figure 5) illustrates the higher-resolution detail available without leaving the platform.

  • Figures 4: Segmented Lightfield 4D image from a control well. Each channel was captured in a single volumetric snapshot.

    Download image (521 KB)
  • Figure 5: Segmented Airyscan image of the same field of view as Figure 4, acquired on the same instrument

    Download image (451 KB)

Across the dose series, organoid structure progressively lost cohesion with increasing SN-38 concentration (Figure 6). Increasing concentration of SN-38 also resulted in fewer GFP-positive cells.. GFP-positive cells declined steadily from 0.5 nM through 500 nM, with the two highest doses producing the most pronounced effect (Figure 7). At 500 nM, GFP-positive tumor-cell count was reduced by approximately 57% relative to the media control. Drug response was comparable at both seeding densities.

  • Representative images from each treatment group, segmented by channel. Organoid structure becomes less cohesive as drug concentration increases.

    Figure 6: Representative images from each treatment group, segmented by channel. Organoid structure becomes less cohesive as drug concentration increases.

    Download image (113 KB)
  • Figure 7: Cell count as a function of drug concentration. Counts were measured from each organoid volume using arivis Pro.

  • Figure 7: Cell count as a function of drug concentration. Counts were measured from each organoid volume using arivis Pro.

  • Figure 7: Cell count as a function of drug concentration. Counts were measured from each organoid volume using arivis Pro.

Cell count as a function of drug concentration

 

The RFP-positive fibroblasts told a different story. The stromal compartment remained largely stable across the concentration range, dropping only modestly at the highest dose. That selectivity of pronounced tumor-cell loss alongside a preserved stroma is consistent with a tumor-directed effect of SN-38 in this co-culture.

Seeing the whole picture

  • Figure 8: Cell counts from the same organoids analyzed as the full 3D volume (“True 3D”) versus a maximum-intensity projection (“3D-MIP”) of that volume.

  • Figure 8: Cell counts from the same organoids analyzed as the full 3D volume (“True 3D”) versus a maximum-intensity projection (“3D-MIP”) of that volume.

  • Figure 8: Cell counts from the same organoids analyzed as the full 3D volume (“True 3D”) versus a maximum-intensity projection (“3D-MIP”) of that volume.

3D counting vs. 2D projection

Because Lightfield 4D records the entire volume, the same dataset can be analyzed as a full 3D count or as a single 2D maximum-intensity projection (MIP). This allows the two readouts to be compared on identical samples (Figure 8). Both reproduced the dose-dependent decline, so a projection may suffice for a simple yes/no call. But the projection consistently undercounted: full 3D analysis recovered roughly 2.3 times as many tumor cells and 2.5 times as many nuclei as the MIP, while the larger, more sparsely distributed fibroblasts were barely affected. The cause is geometric and the reality that cells stacked along the projection axis overlap and collapse into single objects, an effect that worsens precisely where tumor organoids are densest.

For quantitative work of ranking compounds, fitting dose-response curves, or resolving small differences between closely related candidates, an undercount of this size compresses dynamic range and can distort potency estimates. The practical advantage of Lightfield 4D is that the more accurate 3D readout costs nothing extra. The whole volume is already in hand from the single snapshot, so accuracy and throughput stop being a trade-off. 

Conclusion

Quantitative 3D screening without the throughput penalty

Pairing reproducible organoid co-cultures with the ZEISS LSM 990 Lightfield 4D for volumetric imaging and ZEISS arivis Pro for 3D analysis produces a workable route to quantitative drug-response screening in 384-well format. In brief:
  • single snapshot 3D volume icon graphic

    Lightfield 4D captured the full 3D volume of 200–325 µm organoids in a single snapshot, removing the need for serial z-sectioning.

  • Dose response icon graphic

    A clear dose-response emerged across 0.5–500 nM SN-38, with 500 nM reducing tumor-cell count by approximately 57% versus media controls.

  • High res screen icon graphic

    The integrated Lightfield 4D and Airyscan workflow on one LSM 990 platform enabled a rapid screen followed by targeted high-resolution imaging.

  • Volumetric counting icon graphic

    Full volumetric counting recovered roughly 2–2.5× more tumor cells and nuclei than 2D projections, underscoring the value of true 3D readouts for quantitative screens.

Taken together, these results indicate that volumetric organoid imaging is practical at screening scale, and that 3D-resolved metrics give a more complete picture of drug response than conventional 2D approaches.

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out in collaboration with InSphero AG, whose Akura™ 384 ImagePro platform and reproducible tumor–stroma organoid co-cultures formed the biological basis of the study.

ZEISS logo

ZEISS Microscopy

Insphero logo

Insphero