OR efficiency

  • Clinical challenge
  • ZEISS solution
  • Download

OR efficiency without compromising patient safety and satisfaction

The variation in turnover times from 10 up to 60 minutes1 and the improvement on non-surgical process time by up to 30% when using additional surgical equipment2 are just a few of the wide range of factors that significantly influence your OR workflow.

Delays can occur:

  • Before surgery

    During the operating room setup when cleaning and moving equipment.3

  • During surgery

    When adjusting or repositioning the microscope.4

  • After surgery

    In scope of documentation and organization.3

Patient safety plus efficiency, together they contribute to the overall quality of care.

Dr. Vinod Malhotra

OR Excellence. Outpatient Surgery Magazine 2010.

Advance your workflow with fully connected visualization systems

Designed to address your needs, today’s surgical microscopes provide technology ahead of their time to support your clinical decision-making and help you achieve best possible patient outcomes. From enhanced visualization, increased ergonomics, to improved workflows in the OR.5-7

Choosing the appropriate visualization system can have a huge impact on your practice while driving continuous improvements for your patients, your team, your students, and yourself. Experience EXTARO® 300 and TIVATO® 700 from ZEISS – both supporting a digital workflow for increased OR efficiency.

ZEISS EXTARO 300 – Boosting efficiency

ZEISS EXTARO 300 enables you to save valuable time by offering

  • Augmented Visualization
  • Single-Handed Operation
  • Digital Data Management

Stay up to date

Download now: OR efficiency in ENT surgery – discoveries in research

More information about the download - not mandatory

Form is loading...

If you want to have more information on data processing at ZEISS please refer to our data privacy notice.

More challenges in ENT surgery

Data management

  • 1

    Hampson L. Reducing Turnover Times in the Operating Room. Every minute counts. University of California San Francisco Center forHealthcare Value. 2014 Jan 27.

  • 2

    Pakdil, F., Harwood, T. (2005). Factors that influence efficiency in performing ENT cases: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. Journal of Medical Systems, 29, 285–301.

  • 3

    Pakdil F, Harwood T. Factors that influence efficiency in performing ENT cases: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. J Med Syst 2005;29(3).

  • 4

    Ma L, Fei B. Comprehensive review of surgical microscopes: technology development and medical applications. J Biomed Opt 2021;26(1):010901.

  • 5

    Vedula, S. and Hager G. (2017). Surgical data science: The new knowledge domain. Innovative Surgical Sciences, 2(3), 109–121.

  • 6

    Stauder, R. et al. (2017). Surgicaldataprocessingforsmart intraoperative assistancesystems. Innovative SurgicalSciences, 2(3), 145–152.

  • 7

    Maier-Hein, L. et al. (2017). Surgical Data Science: Enabling next-generation surgery. Natural Biomedical Engineering, 1, 691–696. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1701/1701.06482.pdf